Scenario Matrix
| Scenario | Users | Required capabilities | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Request triage | IT, legal, design, admin, support | Group mention, knowledge base, ticketing tool, group rules. | Partially available |
| Group catch-up and tracking | PMs, team leads | Group context, summarization, todo detection, Schedule Trigger. | Partially available |
| Docs and tickets | Product, delivery, support | Discussion summary, document templates, ticket/document tools. | Partially available |
| Project status | PM, delivery, customer success | Project group context, tickets, approvals, calendars, report routine. | Partially available |
| Data questions | Business, operations, data teams | BI toolset, semantic model, read-only data connection, chart output. | Partially available |
| Knowledge lookup | Everyone | Knowledge base, document sources, citations. | Available foundation |
| Document review | Compliance, procurement, presales, legal | File input, knowledge base, checklist, review report. | Partially available |
| Sales state | Sales, customer success | CRM, calls, deals, customer knowledge base. | Planned |
| Monitoring alerts | SRE, operations, engineering | Monitoring/log/ticket tools, group watch, scheduled checks. | Planned |
| Bugs and GitHub | Engineering, QA, product | Coding Expert, code platform, CI, PR follow-up. | Partially available |
Request Triage
Good for#ask-it, design support, legal help, and customer support groups.
Example:
- Group mention and DM triggers.
- Knowledge base Q&A.
- Ticketing tools or custom workflows.
- Message aggregation window.
- Group memory for “how to triage requests”.
- Group message watch for unhandled requests.
- Unified duplicate detection and weekly theme rollups.
Group Catch-Up And Tracking
Good for project, release, and customer delivery groups. Example:- Lark message history and resource tools.
- Trigger conversation context.
- Schedule Trigger.
- Text or card result rendering.
- Group history capability differs by IM platform.
- Live checklist and unified progress display are not yet common.
- Group-level routine management.
- Group memory for report format and project rules.
Docs And Tickets
Good for requirement discussions, customer feedback, incident reviews, and meeting notes. Example:- Digital experts can generate structured document drafts.
- Knowledge bases, toolsets, and templates.
- Some platforms support files, cards, or links.
- Tag artifact management page.
- Unified “turn into ticket/doc/approval” buttons from group chat.
- Unified audit linking outputs to the Tag session.
Data Questions
Good for operations, business analysis, and sales management groups. Example:- BI toolset, ChatBI, semantic models, and indicator management.
- Digital experts can call tools and produce analysis.
- Returning charts and files reliably in IM depends on platform capability.
- Group-level read-only data Access Bundle is not productized yet.
Knowledge Lookup
Good for policy Q&A, product manuals, implementation manuals, and presales material. Example:- Knowledge base retrieval.
- Document-source integrations such as Lark documents.
- Digital experts can answer with sources.
- Start pilots with read-only knowledge bases.
- Require sources or citations in answers.
- Move stable rules into skills or group memory.
Monitoring Alerts
Good for SRE, operations, and engineering incident groups. Example:- Toolsets or custom plugins can connect monitoring, logs, and tickets.
- Digital experts can generate diagnosis steps and summaries.
- Group watch to trigger alert analysis automatically.
- Monitoring Access Bundle.
- Default-deny network egress and credential proxy.
- Alert routine state management.
Bugs And GitHub
Good for engineering, QA, and code review groups. Example:- Coding Expert supports mainstream code platform connections and issue/PR workflows.
- Virtual environment, Git tools, and code execution tools can support code analysis.
- Full code-platform tasks from IM groups require combining digital experts and toolsets.
- “Open PR, follow CI, and post updates back to the group” is not yet a unified Tag flow.
- Group-level GitHub repository grants.
- PR follow routines.
- Bidirectional links between PRs and Tag sessions with unified audit.